Wysyłka i dostawaKliknij Zobacz szczegóły, aby uzyskać dodatkowe informacje dotyczące wysyłki i zwrotów.
Masz taki przedmiot na sprzedaż?

Chwytanie za rękę: Kelo przeciwko City of New London i granice wybitnej domeny, ...

Tekst oryginalny
Grasping Hand : Kelo v. City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain, ...
Great Book Prices Store
  • (312633)
  • Zarejestrowany jako sprzedawca-firma
US $29,77
Około114,00 zł
Stan:
Nowy
Dostępne: 3
Wysyłka:
Bezpłatnie Economy Shipping.
Znajduje się w: Jessup, Maryland, Stany Zjednoczone
Dostawa:
Szacowana między Pt, 4 paź a Cz, 10 paź do 43230
Szacowane czasy dostaw - otwiera się w nowym oknie lub nowej karcie uwzględniają podany przez sprzedawcę czas na wysłanie przesyłki, kod pocztowy nadawcy, kod pocztowy odbiorcy i czas przyjęcia. Czasy te zależą od wybranego rodzaju usługi wysyłkowej oraz czasu rozliczenia płatnościrozliczona płatność - otwiera się w nowym oknie lub nowej karcie. Czasy dostawy mogą się różnić, szczególnie w okresach największego ruchu.
Zwroty:
Zwrot w ciągu 14 dni. Za wysyłkę zwrotną płaci kupujący.
Płatności:
    

Kupuj bez obaw

Gwarancja zwrotu pieniędzy eBay
Sprzedawca ponosi pełną odpowiedzialność za wystawienie tej oferty sprzedaży.
Nr przedmiotu eBay: 386849829747
Ostatnia aktualizacja: 20-09-2024 16:05:26 CEST Wyświetl wszystkie poprawkiWyświetl wszystkie poprawki

Parametry przedmiotu

Stan
Nowy: Nowa, nieczytana, nieużywana książka w idealnym stanie, wszystkie strony, bez uszkodzeń. Aby ...
Book Title
Grasping Hand : Kelo v. City of New London and the Limits of Emin
ISBN
9780226422169
Subject Area
Law, Business & Economics
Publication Name
Grasping Hand : Kelo V. City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Item Length
0.9 in
Subject
Housing & Urban Development, Land Use, Development / Economic Development, Legal History, Property
Publication Year
2016
Type
Textbook
Format
Trade Paperback
Language
English
Item Height
0.1 in
Author
Ilya Somin
Item Weight
19.1 Oz
Item Width
0.6 in
Number of Pages
384 Pages

O tym produkcie

Product Identifiers

Publisher
University of Chicago Press
ISBN-10
022642216X
ISBN-13
9780226422169
eBay Product ID (ePID)
10038307130

Product Key Features

Number of Pages
384 Pages
Language
English
Publication Name
Grasping Hand : Kelo V. City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain
Subject
Housing & Urban Development, Land Use, Development / Economic Development, Legal History, Property
Publication Year
2016
Type
Textbook
Author
Ilya Somin
Subject Area
Law, Business & Economics
Format
Trade Paperback

Dimensions

Item Height
0.1 in
Item Weight
19.1 Oz
Item Length
0.9 in
Item Width
0.6 in

Additional Product Features

Intended Audience
Scholarly & Professional
Dewey Edition
23
TitleLeading
The
Reviews
Somin's thorough rebuttal of the constitutional reasoning and philosophical implications of the Supreme Court's Kelo decision demonstrates why that ruling was a constructive disaster: It was so dreadful it has provoked robust defenses of the role of private property in sustaining Americans' liberty., In this carefully researched and convincingly argued volume, Somin provides a powerful critique of the Supreme Court's 'public use' jurisprudence and the controversial Kelo decision. He also gives careful attention to the hostile public reaction to the ruling and points out that much of the post- Kelo reform legislation is inadequate to prevent future eminent domain abuse. This insightful book belongs on the shelf of anyone interested in the place of property rights in constitutional law., An absorbing study not only of the Kelo case, but of the legal and historical context in which it arose; it reveals the fragility of our individual rights against the seemingly boundless power of the modern state and reminds us that we must continue to challenge this kind of arbitrary power in the courts and in the political forum., Somin has written what is likely to be the definitive legal analysis of Kelo , its aftermath, and its future prospects. . . . The Grasping Hand is excellent at laying out the political and doctrinal developments that led up to Kelo and at canvassing the backlash and legislative response to it., [A] must-read for anyone interested in the politics and history of property rights and property law in the United States. Its appeal is even broader though, and it would be fruitfully read by anyone with an interest in constitutional theory, judicial impact, or cause lawyering., "[A] must-read for anyone interested in the politics and history of property rights and property law in the United States. Its appeal is even broader though, and it would be fruitfully read by anyone with an interest in constitutional theory, judicial impact, or cause lawyering."  , "A thorough exploration of Kelo v. City of New London  and the power of eminent domain generally. . . . If the goal of The Grasping Hand was to retrieve the original meaning of 'public use' from scholarly and jurisprudential oblivion, Somin has succeeded. Will the Court recognize its error and eventually overrule Kelo ? One can only hope."  , For anyone interested in the Kelo case, I recommend Somin's book. It is the first book-length discussion of the Kelo appellate proceedings by a legal scholar. It is also by far the most exhaustively researched history of the public use doctrine in the state and federal courts before and since Kelo . While I do not share Somin's opposition to the Kelo decision, I welcome his good scholarship on the subject., Kelo v. The City of New London , perhaps the most derided Supreme Court case in recent memory, has finally received the thorough review it deserves. . . . The Grasping Hand chronicles what led to the infamous decision a decade ago. More importantly, it shows why people of all political persuasions should care about eminent-domain abuse. Somin also adds to the literature by evaluating the effectiveness of the many state laws passed in Kelo 's wake to curtail government abuse of eminent domain., A thorough exploration of Kelo v. City of New London and the power of eminent domain generally. . . . If the goal of The Grasping Hand was to retrieve the original meaning of 'public use' from scholarly and jurisprudential oblivion, Somin has succeeded. Will the Court recognize its error and eventually overrule Kelo ? One can only hope., The Grasping Hand is likely to be the definitive analysis of the Supreme Court's controversial decision in the Kelo case. But Somin attends to much more than that. He sets out the political and doctrinal history that led up to Kelo and critiques the legislative and judicial developments provoked by the reaction to it. Somin has long been a champion of strong property rights. What he has to say will be of value to those who share that commitment and perhaps even more to those who don't., The definitive treatment of eminent domain and the Kelo case. As you might expect, Somin discusses the legal issues with aplomb [and] offers . . . an eye-opening investigation of the history behind many of the major cases., "An absorbing study not only of the Kelo case, but of the legal and historical context in which it arose; it reveals the fragility of our individual rights against the seemingly boundless power of the modern state and reminds us that we must continue to challenge this kind of arbitrary power in the courts and in the political forum."  , Sharp legal, economic, and historical analysis of the eminent domain debate . . . . The Grasping Hand tells the story of the battle in fascinating detail. Somin succinctly recounts the facts that many readers will remember but adds a great deal of additional detail to show many ugly but unknown truths about it., By dint of his uncommon thoroughness, Somin has become the leading and most persuasive critic of the Supreme Court's ill-fated Kelo decision. His close examination of the case's factual backdrop offers chilling confirmation of his central thesis: weak constitutional protection of property rights opens the door to political intrigue that exacts its greatest toll on the poor and vulnerable in society. Somin's gripping account confirms your worst fears about big government., An in-depth legal analysis of one of the most controversial Supreme Court decisions in recent times. . . . The book provides a very well-written review of the background of the case, a close legal analysis of the relevant case law leading up to it, a detailed review of the legislative and judicial responses to the decision, and a discussion of possible safeguards against excessive use of eminent domain in the face of the Court's ruling., For much of America's past, the rhetoric of property rights was the dominant trope for advocates of democratic and egalitarian economic policies. The anti- Kelo backlash provides a brief glimpse of what a revived, populist property rights rhetoric might look like. Building on that moment would involve some uncomfortable adjustments by both libertarians and liberals. Somin's intriguing book illustrates both the promise and the challenges of that effort., The definitive treatment of eminent domain and the Kelo case. As you might expect, Somin discusses the legal issues with aplomb [and] offers . . . an eye-opening investigation of the history behind many of the major cases., [A] key contribution to the literature on property rights. I dare say that this is the most important book on eminent domain since Epstein's classic, Takings. . . . [Somin's] voice is the voice of reason, precisely the kind of scholarship that is sorely needed in our polarized society. And this book is, today, the leading authority on Kelo ., Somin provides a fine tour of the case and of the intellectual history of eminent-domain law. More important, he provides a framework for thinking about the future of eminent domain and private property. . . . Somin has written an important book that maps the road ahead for those who believe that individual freedom cannot be separated from the protection of private property., For anyone interested in the Kelo case, I recommend Somin's book. It is the first book-length discussion of the Kelo appellate proceedings by a legal scholar. It is also by far the most exhaustively researched history of the public use doctrine in the state and federal courts before and since Kelo . While I do not share Somin's opposition to the Kelo decision, I welcome his good scholarship on the subject., Somin is one of the world's leading scholars on private property rights, and his analysis of the history of eminent domain and the Kelo decision is extremely thorough and insightful. But The Grasping Hand has something more than just solid legal history and reasoning. With its interviews with property owners and explorations of how eminent domain plays out in the real world, the book, unlike virtually all other scholarly works on eminent domain, compellingly communicates the human dimension and costs of governments teaming up with private interests to take the homes, small businesses, and other property of Americans.
Illustrated
Yes
Dewey Decimal
343.73/0252
Table Of Content
Preface to the Paperback Edition Acknowledgments Introduction Chapter 1. The Trouble in Fort Trumbull Chapter 2. From Public Use to Public Purpose Chapter 3. The Perils of Public Purpose Chapter 4. The Kelo Decision Chapter 5. The Political Backlash Chapter 6. Why the Backlash Often Fell Short Chapter 7. The Judicial Reaction Chapter 8. Should Blight and Economic Development Takings Be Reformed or Banned? Conclusion Appendix A Appendix B Notes Index
Edition Description
Enlarged edition
Synopsis
In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled that the city of New London, Connecticut, could condemn fifteen residential properties in order to transfer them to a new private owner. Although the Fifth Amendment only permits the taking of private property for "public use," the Court ruled that the transfer of condemned land to private parties for "economic development" is permitted by the Constitution--even if the government cannot prove that the expected development will ever actually happen. The Court's decision in Kelo v. City of New London empowered the grasping hand of the state at the expense of the invisible hand of the market. In this detailed study of one of the most controversial Supreme Court cases in modern times, Ilya Somin argues that Kelo was a grave error. Economic development and "blight" condemnations are unconstitutional under both originalist and most "living constitution" theories of legal interpretation. They also victimize the poor and the politically weak for the benefit of powerful interest groups and often destroy more economic value than they create. Kelo itself exemplifies these patterns. The residents targeted for condemnation lacked the influence needed to combat the formidable government and corporate interests arrayed against them. Moreover, the city's poorly conceived development plan ultimately failed: the condemned land lies empty to this day, occupied only by feral cats. The Supreme Court's unpopular ruling triggered an unprecedented political reaction, with forty-five states passing new laws intended to limit the use of eminent domain. But many of the new laws impose few or no genuine constraints on takings. The Kelo backlash led to significant progress, but not nearly as much as it may have seemed. Despite its outcome, the closely divided 5-4 ruling shattered what many believed to be a consensus that virtually any condemnation qualifies as a public use under the Fifth Amendment. It also showed that there is widespread public opposition to eminent domain abuse. With controversy over takings sure to continue, The Grasping Hand offers the first book-length analysis of Kelo by a legal scholar, alongside a broader history of the dispute over public use and eminent domain and an evaluation of options for reform., Ilya Somin's The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain is the definitive review of one of the most controversial Supreme Court cases of the 21st century.  Somin provides a thorough analysis of the case's historic and factual background along with the broader history of American public-purpose takings and the challenges posed by economic-development takings.  The book offers a detailed account of the trajectory of the Kelo case itself, from the neighbors electing to fight their eviction through finding legal representation via a collection of strange-bedfellow public-interest groups.  The litigators' strategies are examined and Somin brings us into the Supreme Court to scrutinize the thrust and parry of oral argument.  Somin's close reading and incisive critique of the Kelo opinion is the heart of the book.  Holding that the Court made several serious doctrinal errors, Somin carefully parses the majority opinion, concurrences, and dissents to show where the Justices went wrong, and even offers some responsible speculation about why.  A notably unpopular verdict, Kelo sparked significant political backlash.  Somin takes a qualitative and quantitative tour through the large number of new state laws passed in the wake of Kelo , studying the mechanisms by which they were passed, their effectiveness, and public awareness of these new laws.  The work concludes with recommendations toward reform, or prohibition, of takings justified on the premise of blight or hoped-for private economic development., In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled that the city of New London, Connecticut, could condemn fifteen residential properties in order to transfer them to a new private owner. Although the Fifth Amendment only permits the taking of private property for "public use," the Court ruled that the transfer of condemned land to private parties for "economic development" is permitted by the Constitution-even if the government cannot prove that the expected development will ever actually happen. The Court's decision in Kelo v. City of New London empowered the grasping hand of the state at the expense of the invisible hand of the market. In this detailed study of one of the most controversial Supreme Court cases in modern times, Ilya Somin argues that Kelo was a grave error. Economic development and "blight" condemnations are unconstitutional under both originalist and most "living constitution" theories of legal interpretation. They also victimize the poor and the politically weak for the benefit of powerful interest groups and often destroy more economic value than they create. Kelo itself exemplifies these patterns. The residents targeted for condemnation lacked the influence needed to combat the formidable government and corporate interests arrayed against them. Moreover, the city's poorly conceived development plan ultimately failed: the condemned land lies empty to this day, occupied only by feral cats. The Supreme Court's unpopular ruling triggered an unprecedented political reaction, with forty-five states passing new laws intended to limit the use of eminent domain. But many of the new laws impose few or no genuine constraints on takings. The Kelo backlash led to significant progress, but not nearly as much as it may have seemed. Despite its outcome, the closely divided 5-4 ruling shattered what many believed to be a consensus that virtually any condemnation qualifies as a public use under the Fifth Amendment. It also showed that there is widespread public opposition to eminent domain abuse. With controversy over takings sure to continue, The Grasping Hand offers the first book-length analysis of Kelo by a legal scholar, alongside a broader history of the dispute over public use and eminent domain and an evaluation of options for reform.
LC Classification Number
KF5599.S66 2016

Opis przedmiotu podany przez sprzedawcę

Informacje o firmie

Expert Trading Limited
John Boyer
9220 Rumsey Rd
Ste 101
21045-1956 Columbia, MD
United States
Pokaż informacje kontaktowe
:liam-Emoc.secirpkoobtaerg@sredroyabe
Oświadczam, że wszystkie moje działania związane ze sprzedażą będą zgodne z wszystkimi przepisami i regulacjami UE.
Great Book Prices Store

Great Book Prices Store

96,6% opinii pozytywnych
Sprzedane przedmioty: 1,2 mln
Dołączył: lut 2017
Zwykle odpowiada w ciągu 24 godzin

Oceny szczegółowe

Średnia z ostatnich 12 miesięcy
Dokładność opisu
4.9
Przystępny koszt wysyłki
5.0
Szybkość wysyłki
4.9
Komunikacja
4.8
Zarejestrowany jako sprzedawca-firma

Opinie sprzedawców (353 201)